The quote from George R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones was only half complete.
Yet for this post, the rest of it seems overwhelmingly relevant. Martin
continues in the quote to tell readers, “Make it your strength. Then it can
never be your weakness. Armor yourself in it, and it will never be used to hurt
you.” This is all in reference to the ‘who’ that the world will never forever
remember you to be. This part of the quote alone serves as a valuable lesson in
its own right. People have to take an image, despite how bad it may be, and use
it to their advantage. If the world will never forget, use it to your own
devices and make it your own.
This is a tactic often employed by
the media as well. Often people just refer to them as media cover-ups. In American news, stories are exposed all the
time of how journalists hid a story on a certain politician or left out key
details in reporting. Every media outlet does this to a certain degree, because
media doesn’t lack bias. Each outlet is trying to project the version of the
news it wants its viewers to believe as truth.
It is now my third week working for
the EPP Press and the position is slowly growing on me more and more. The
feelings of uncertainty and indifference were starting to vanish. No, it wasn’t
the office an MEP, but yes it did offer that immersion into politics I was
hoping to have.
This week was my introduction into
the weekly EPP press meetings. They take place every Monday morning (with the
exception of Strasbourg week) and outline what the press is responsible for
covering throughout the week. It’s set up similar to a board meeting. The press
advisors from the twenty-eight member states surround the table as the head ofthe EPP Press, Pedro Lopez, sits at the head of the table. The interns sit (if
they manage to find a seat), but mostly stand in the back and observe the
meeting.
After the brief meeting, Pauline, my
supervisor, and I were off to meet with the other press advisors who worked for
the Foreign Affairs committee with the EPP Group. It was a large office in an
area of the building I had never been to before. A bold, stocky German sat at
the forefront behind his desk. The rest, Pauline and myself included, circled
his desk. “I feel like I’m a real editor at a newspaper again with a team,” he
remarked. The issue of the week was the Lampedusa Tragedy.
“If we would have just gotten to the
story first none of this would have happened,” the German started. “This whole
catastrophe would have never gotten out. Now we look bad. Not just the European
Union, but the EPP Group too. This needs a new angle.”
He was referring to the current
backlash the European Union was receiving on its policies toward migration,
which I learned is how it is described in Europe. The term immigration is never
used like in the United States. Europe has always been the Promised Land for
those whose own country was experiencing turmoil. Especially for those located
in the Middle East and Africa, because geographically Europe is so close within
reach. Some parts of Spain almost touch Africa. A simple ferry ride fromMorocco can land someone in Spain in as little as two and a half hours.
In the Lampedusa tragedy, African
migrants were fleeing from Eritrea to the small Italian island in poorly made
boats. Disastrously on one of these perilous journeys, a boat sunk and there
were more than three hundred lives lost. These lives included young children
traveling with their parents.
The German kept talking, “We as the
EPP have to find a way to deal with this positively. Policies could’ve been better,
but let’s look at it from development. We’ll spin the story as Lampedusa
Tragedy sparks wake up call in development policy and human rights. Must work
harder to improve conditions in their homes so people will want to stay instead
of changing asylum and refugee policies.”
Honestly, the idea was brilliant.
This man was taking a crisis that exposed the flaws of the European Union nothaving a common foreign policy and turning into a development issue. It is
common knowledge in Europe that when it comes to foreign policy, including
issues of border control, these decisions are left to the individual member
state and there is not one that is European-wide. The result is many
complications, because the European is not able to create a unified image on international
issues when twenty-eight member states are all voicing their own stance.
I left the meeting with mixed
feelings. The approach was beyond clever. I’m sure Martin would be delighted to
hear of such a strategy. It was as if his advice was being used word for word,
yet ethically it all felt wrong. Was it correct to push the attention away from
the lack of a European Union foreign policy? Was it fair to make it all about development,
but not focus on better methods for assisting those looking for a better life
in Europe? These were questions that may never receive tangible answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment